Venue: Ground Floor Committee Room - Loxley House, Station Street, Nottingham, NG2 3NG. View directions
Contact: Phil Wye Email: phil.wye@nottinghamcity.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies for absence Minutes: Councillor Sally Longford Councillor Dave Liversidge TM |
|
Declarations of Interests Minutes: None |
|
Last meeting held on 1 February 2016 (for confirmation) Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 1 February 2016 were confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chair. |
|
Attainment of Children in Care 2015 PDF 428 KB Report of the Director, Children’s Integrated Service Minutes: Malcolm Wilson, Virtual School Headteacher, introduced the report explaining the recent trends in educational attainment of Nottingham City Children in Care (CiC) by analysis of their performance at Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 4. Malcolm highlighted the following:
(a)
Key Stage 2 results are promising and have improved over the past 4
years. They are higher than the national average in reading,
writing, grammar, punctuation and spelling, and maths; (b)
Key Stage 4 results are not as encouraging as at Key Stage 2, with
only 6% of CiC achieving 5 or more A*-C
grades in their GCSEs, including English and Maths. This is lower
than the national average. There has been a year on year decline in
attainment, however this is mirrored nationally; (c)
the Virtual School has offered
£500 additional Pupil Premium Plus funding to all schools
with Key Stage 4 pupils who are at risk of not achieving their full
potential in GCSE English and Maths. This offer has also been
extended to all schools with Year 5 and Year 6 pupils. The funding
will be monitored to record its impact but improvement is predicted
for this year’s Key Stage 4 results; (d) Letterbox Club, which provides mathematics materials and literacy resources, is purchased for CiC in years 1,3,5 and 7.
The following responses were given following questions from the Board:
(e)
the reasons as to why Key Stage 2 pupils perform better than Key
Stage 4 pupils are complex, however one reason may be that younger
children have a stronger relationship with teachers and key workers
than those who become CiC at a later
stage; (f) the Promoting the Achievement of Looked After Children programme applies to all schools, even those without CiC as they may have these in the future. It can also be helpful for children from other difficult backgrounds.
RESOLVED to
(1)
note the recent trends and current levels of
educational attainment for Nottingham City’s Children in
Care; (2) note the proposed interventions to improve attainment and secure a narrowing of the gap between the performance of CiC and that of other pupils in the city schools, and between city CiC and our statistical neighbours. |
|
The Health of Children in Care of the Local Authority - Nottingham City PDF 285 KB Report of the Executive director of Nursing Quality and Patient Experience for Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust and the Director of Children’s Integrated Services Minutes: Dr Emma Fillmore, Consultant Community Paediatrician and previous Designated Doctor for Children in Care, presented the report and highlighted the following:
(a)
the Children in Care Health team
includes doctors and nurses working with CiC across Nottingham City. There are service
specifications and identified key performance indicators which are
reported on quarterly to the commissioners for Nottingham City and
annually through the annual report; (b)
every child or young person has a health
assessment carried out on entering the care of the Local Authority.
This is carried out within 20 working days of entering care. Review
assessments are then carried out twice a year for children under
the age of 5 and annually for children over the age of 5 up to
their 18th birthday; (c)
the Medical Advisors for Adoption report on the health of
prospective adopters following a health check from the GP,
reporting on any health issues on the adopter’s ability to
parent a CiC; (d)
the Designated Doctor and Nurse will offer expert advice and be
involved in any dissemination of recommendations for a Serious Case
Review; (e)
from April 2015 care leavers due their
last health assessment will be offered an Important Health
Information Pack, providing information about their individual and
family health history as appropriate. This was designed with
CiC locally , with Children in Care
Council being active participants in its design; (f) the Children in Care Health Team has successfully received accreditation and recognition of being young person friendly, meeting the Department of Health ‘You’re Welcome’ quality criteria.
The following responses were given in answer to questions from the Board:
(g)
there has been an increase in the amount
of adult health assessments carried out due to a number of factors.
More adults are coming through as prospective adopters, and in the
past not all adults had the assessment that they should have. It is
statutory for prospective adopters to be assessed and good practice
for special guardians and foster carers; (h)
health information for care leavers is
currently collected by the team, and will be reported to the Board
in future reports. RESOLVED to
(1)
note the performance of the Children in Care and
Adoption Health Team; (2)
acknowledge the need for the development of a Leaving
Care/Transition nurse post within the health team; (3) recommend that the additional city funding, provided by the City Commissioners is maintained to address performance issues around initial Health Assessment timescales. |
|
NCSCB Missing Report PDF 130 KB Report of the Director, Children’s Integrated Service Minutes: Clive Chambers, Head of Service, Safeguarding and Quality Assurance, presented the report setting out the local arrangements in place to respond to children who go missing from home or care. Clive highlighted the following:
(a)
there is a difference between missing
children and absent children. Absent children’s whereabouts
are known as opposed to missing children whose whereabouts are
unknown; (b)
the police will inform the council of
all missing children they become aware of, as well as all those who
have returned. When they return, a return interview is carried out
which identifies the reasons for going missing and attempts to
address these; (c)
where a young person is identified as particularly vulnerable, a
meeting will take place, chaired by an Independent Reviewing
Officer, to look at how best to support and protect them; (d)
further work is planned to develop a
system to analyse the information in return interviews to provide a
more qualitative insight into the local profile of children who go
missing. The following answers were given in response to questions from the Board:
(e)
return interviews should be carried out
within 72 hours of the child’s return. Key names and
locations are noted to make connections with other missing
children. Further work is planned to develop this to be more
systematic and to share information with the police; (f)
at children’s homes, conversations will still be had with
staff and managers as well, as children will not always open up to
strangers; (g) missing children are a potential indicator of Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE), however CSE resources are limited and should be targeted where needed.
RESOLVED to consider the work being carried out by Nottingham City Council in supporting children who go missing from care and from home. |
|
Edge of Care Provision PDF 204 KB Report of the Director, Children’s Social Care, Vulnerable Children and Families Minutes: Mark Ball, Edge of Care Hub Manager, introduced the report providing an update on the work of the Edge of Care Hub, highlighting the following:
(a)
the Edge of Care Hub was established in 2013 to address concerns
following rising numbers of Children in Care (CiC), with the objective of diverting children and
young people from care proceedings; (b)
over 50 families have been referred to
the Hub, with no families disengaging and 90% having been kept
together avoiding children becoming CiC. 23 families now also have no further social
care involvement; (c)
the Hub works on a family’s capacity to change, utilising
innovative ideas are to ensure long-lasting change; (d) although supporting families is the primary objective of the Hub, it also provides net budget relief of £427,520 from 1st April to 31st December 2015.
The Board congratulated the Edge of Care team
on its success, and noted that it has contributed to a stable level
of CiC in Nottingham compared to
national levels. RESOLVED to note the service being provided by the Edge of Care Hub and to acknowledge the benefits offered by its existence. |
|
Children in Care Council - 2015 Have Your Say Survey Results PDF 188 KB Report of the Director, Children’s Integrated Service Additional documents:
Minutes: Jon Rea, Engagement and Participation Lead, introduced the report summarising the findings of the 2015 Have Your Say survey of Children in Care and Foster Carers, highlighting the following:
(a)
the survey findings provide an insight into the views of Children
in Care and Foster Carers, and provides an opportunity to make
their voices heard; (b)
the survey forms part of the council’s strategy for
engagement as some CiC don’t
participate in other ways such as the Children in Care
Council; (c)
128 usable returns were received from a total of 690 surveys sent
out. This is a 19% success rate which is higher than the national
average of just 4.3%. However, there is still ambition to increase
this number. There is also an easier version of the survey
available for children under 10; (d)
the findings of the survey help to shape
Children in Care Council meetings, which goes on to help officers
to shape services. The Children in Care Council rated progress
against the commitments made by the Corporate Parenting Board in
the Children in Care and Care Leavers’ Charter, using RAG
(Red, Green Amber) ratings. Jeren Artykova from the Children in Care Council then presented the findings of the Children in Care Council, highlighting the following:
(e)
progress against two Charter Commitments
was indicated red. The CiC Council
found that more needs to be done to ensure that CiC are aware of and have access to the advocacy
and complaints service, and that consistency needs to be improved
to reduce the amount of unnecessary
change in CiC’s lives; (f)
progress against one Charter Commitment
was indicated red/amber. The CiC
Council found that more needs to be done to ensure CiC and Care Leavers have the time and help to
understand and be happy with their circumstances; (g)
progress against three Charter
Commitments was indicated amber. The CiC Council found that more needs to be done to
ensure CiC are listened to, to involve
them in planning for their care, to achieve in school and
elsewhere, and to help to stay in touch with their birth
family; (h) progress against all other priorities was indicated green or green/amber. The CiC Council found that CiC and Care Leavers are generally happy that they have the right place to live, home life is stable and safe, and they are generally treated with respect and receive support to facilitate transition into adulthood.
The following responses were given in response to concerns of the CiC Council:
(i)
there is a current challenge with
consistency of social workers due to a high turnover of staff and
problems with retention of skilled staff. This has been a problem
nationally as agency staff is paid more than Local Authority staff.
Nottingham is trying to limit movement and get staff to commit to 3
years of work, setting an expectation of a minimum commitment. By
June the CiC Service should be without
agency staff; (j) regarding access to the advocacy service, some work needs to be done around the channels of communication used to promote this. Advocacy is an important service as it provides CiC with somebody external to talk to. Communications may need modernising, with use of social media and investment into publicising this service, with carers as well as CiC.
Board members made the following comments in the conversation which followed:
(k)
the Children in Care Health team could help to signpost young
people to advocacy services as they see most of them once a
year; (l)
although changes in social worker is not
ideal for any CiC, some are more
vulnerable than others and so consistency should be assured for
these. RESOLVED to
(1)
use the findings from the survey results to inform
relevant service and corporate action and business plans; (2)
recognise the hard work done by the CiCC in the planning, delivery and analysis of the
Have Your Say survey, and acknowledge their vital role in the
co-production of services across children’s social
care; (3) implement the findings of the 2015 Have Your Say survey as appropriate. |
|
Minutes: RESOLVED to note the forward plan |