Agenda and minutes

The City of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Economic Prosperity Committee
Friday, 19th December, 2014 10.30 am

Venue: Exploration Room - Explore

Contact: Laura Wilson, Governance Officer  Tel: 0115 8764301

Items
No. Item

33.

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Minutes:

Ian Curryer, Chief Executive of Nottingham City Council

Ruth Hyde OBE, Chief Executive of Broxtowe Borough Council

David Bishop, Nottingham City Council

34.

DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS

Minutes:

None.

35.

MINUTES pdf icon PDF 212 KB

To confirm the minutes of the last meeting held on 26 September 2014

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 26 September 2014 were confirmed and signed by the Chair.

36.

N2 SKILLS AND EMPLOYMENT BOARD pdf icon PDF 307 KB

Mick Burrows, Chief Executive of Nottinghamshire County Council,

Martin Rigley, Chair, N2 Skills and Employment Board

 

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Martin Rigley, Managing Director of Lindhurst Innovation and Chair of the N2 Skills and Employment Board, and Celia Morris of Nottinghamshire County Council, presented the item outlining the N2 Skills and Employment Board’s plans to create a dynamic local economy via the Employment Framework 2015 - 2020. The following information was highlighted:

 

(a)  the biggest issue faced is a skills shortage. The Skills Board is employer led and covers most sectors. There is a need to engage small and large business and as a result the following four priorities have been established:

 

-  Developing an ‘early years to engagement’ approach which ensures that young people in Nottingham and Nottinghamshire are prepared for the world of work and the future needs of our economy;

 

-  Re-engaging unemployed and disengaged people through pathways that prepare and reintroduce them to the labour market;

 

-  Ensuring the local workforce develops the higher level skills needed to increase business productivity and competitiveness whilst enabling individuals to fulfil their potential;

 

-  Making the skills and employment support landscape simpler and more accessible for employers and individuals.

 

(b)  it is clear that existing good practice needs to be built upon, such as those exhibited at the Mansfield Learning Partnership, as it currently functions well.  Young people should be encouraged to engage with the key sectors for the East Midlands in order to gain the right training provision, and increase graduate attraction and retention;

 

(c)  Gedling Borough Council is currently working on a project which gives vital information on Small and Medium Business Enterprises (SMEs) and supports apprenticeships;

 

(d)  currently 32% of graduates are retained in the East Midlands, however further work is required to understand the number of graduates each local authority area retains.  Some areas experience less retention of young people, even though there are a large number of apprenticeships available. A benchmark may be the percentage of Oxbridge graduates which are retained in their local area, though it was acknowledged that Oxford and Cambridge are dissimilar to other Universities. Each constituent council could learn from the each other and this could form part of work of a Combined Authority (CA); 

 

(e)  the formation of a CA would assist the N2 Skills and Employment Board, and the Board would be able to report back to the Economic Prosperity Committee or the CA. Discussions currently being held around the formation of a CA have included the work of the N2 Skills and Employment Board;

 

(f)  access to graduate programme funding has caused some concern amongst members as businesses in Ashfield and Mansfield cannot access certain funds because there are several different schemes available in the area, with little crossover. Engagement with an action plan may be needed to deal with administrative boundary issues;

 

(g)  of the eleven sector priorities identified in the Skills and Employment Framework 2015 – 2020, only ten are addressed in the section titled ‘Developing workforce skills to maximise the potential of N2’ (further work is ongoing regarding Retail and Leisure  ...  view the full minutes text for item 36.

37.

COMBINED AUTHORITY pdf icon PDF 266 KB

Andrew Muter, Chief Executive of Newark and Sherwood District Council

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Andrew Muter, Chief Executive of Newark and Sherwood District Council presented the report on a Combined Authority (CA), highlighting the following information:

 

(a)  although prepared by all constituent authorities, the Governance Review is still in draft form and requires further clarification;

 

(b)  the Governance review sets out the regional context for the CA which is vital as the CA area’s economy  overlaps with other economic areas. Key sectors highlighted include logistics, and transportation;

 

(c)  a CA would cover the Nottingham and Nottinghamshire economic area. This area was traditionally a manufacturing focussed  low-skilled economy with high levels of unemployment;

 

(d)  there are important overlapping areas in the wider region, including with the Sheffield City Region in the North, Derbyshire in the West, and Lincolnshire, Doncaster, and Leicestershire in the South and East;

 

(e)  within Nottinghamshire there is a high level of cohesion and a long history of collaboration, as demonstrated by joint working in the Economic Prosperity Committee.  When moving forward with plans for a CA, there would need to be continued collaboration with the D2N2 LEP (Local Enterprise Partnership), and the relationship with the LEP would need to become stronger;

 

(f)  the formation of a CA has been discussed at several different meetings and these cumulative discussions have added up to a greater understanding of what a CA means. Singularly, local authorities can encourage growth, but a CA would provide a benefit to all authorities collectively. To aid this, the following needs to be recognised:

 

-  trust between all authorities would need to be maintained, and governance arrangements should not be made too complicated;

 

-  the message of working together should be conveyed to central Government;

 

-  the Governance Review and Scheme will need to be formally agreed by individual councils to establish a CA;

 

(g)  further amendments are expected to be made to the Governance Review;  the documents will be taken through each individual council, and each council’s formal decision will need to include the delegation to officers to make minor changes to the documents as they progress, where these changes do not effect substantive matters;

 

(h)  a consultation will run until early February. To help with publicising this, relationships with the media will need to be utilised. It is hoped that the response from the public will be a positive one. The following would need to be addressed in relation to this:

 

-  the public consultation will run before submission of a final report to Government in mid-February 2015;

 

-  a summary of the full report would be beneficial, to support the consultation as the report itself is very long;

 

-  the letter to the public needs to be concise on what a CA is, but also needs to say what it is not;

 

-  a questionnaire will be issued on the CA. The questionnaire will be available online, with a link from every council’s webpage.

 

RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY to

 

(1)  thank officers for their contributions in drafting all appropriate documents;

 

(2)  develop a vision and long term ambitions  ...  view the full minutes text for item 37.