Decision Maker: Executive Board
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Rob Caswell
Notice of decision: 22/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Open
Decision Maker: Executive Board
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Alex Cox
Notice of decision: 22/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Open
Decision Maker: Executive Board
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Ceri Morgan
Notice of decision: 22/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Open
Decision Maker: Executive Board
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Karen Shaw
Notice of decision: 22/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Open
Decision Maker: Executive Board
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Catherine Judge
Notice of decision: 22/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Open
Decision Maker: Executive Board
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Helen Wallace
Notice of decision: 22/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Open
Decision Maker: East Midlands Shared Services Joint Committee
Decision due date: 19/06/2023
Lead officer: Lucy Littlefair
Notice of decision: 19/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons
Explanation of anticipated restriction:
It is not in the public interest to disclose this information because of the sensitive nature of the business affairs referred to in the report that, if published, could prejudice the ability of EMSS to operate competitively in the shared services market. For the avoidance of doubt, this exemption applies such that the report is exempt from publication by both Nottingham City and Leicestershire County Council
Decision Maker: East Midlands Shared Services Joint Committee
Decision due date: 19/06/2023
Lead officer: Lucy Littlefair
Notice of decision: 19/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons
Explanation of anticipated restriction:
It is not in the public interest to disclose this information because of the sensitive nature of the business affairs referred to in the report that, if published, could prejudice the ability of EMSS to operate competitively in the shared services market. For the avoidance of doubt, this exemption applies such that the report is exempt from publication by both Nottingham City Council and Leicestershire County Council
Decision Maker: Companies Governance Executive Committee
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Ian Edward
Notice of decision: 19/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons
Explanation of anticipated restriction:
It is not in the public interest to disclose this information because the appendix contains sensitive commercial information that, if published, would prejudice the Council’s commercial relationships with third parties.
Decision Maker: Companies Governance Executive Committee
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Ian Edward
Notice of decision: 19/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons
Explanation of anticipated restriction:
It is not in the public interest to disclose the information as it could prejudice the trading and marketing position of the companies concerned.
Decision Maker: Companies Governance Executive Committee
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Jiayue Wang
Notice of decision: 19/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons
Explanation of anticipated restriction:
It is not in the public interest to disclose this information as it could prejudice the company trading and marketing position.
Decision Maker: Companies Governance Executive Committee
Decision due date: 20/06/2023
Lead officer: Jiayue Wang
Notice of decision: 19/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons
Explanation of anticipated restriction:
It is not in the public interest to disclose this information as it could prejudice the company trading and marketing position.
Decision Maker: Companies Governance Executive Committee
Decision due date: 18/07/2023
Lead officer: Ian Edward
Notice of decision: 19/05/2023
Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons
Explanation of anticipated restriction:
It is not in the public interest to disclose the information because it could prejudice the trading and marketing position of the companies concerned.