28 Day Executive Notice

28 Day Notice for Commissioning and Procurement Sub-Committee 12/01/2021 (14/12/2020 to 12/01/2021, Commissioning and Procurement Executive Committee)

List items by:

Filter by ward:

Filter by department:

Show items:

Notice items
No.	Item
1.	IT Equipment Programme - Key Decision New! Decision maker: Commissioning and Procurement Executive Committee Decision due: 12 Jan 2021 Lead officer: Rav Ghattaora Notice of proposed decision first published: 14/12/2020 Anticipated restriction: Open -
2.	Statutory Regulatory Services Digital Platform Investment - Key Decision New! Decision maker: Commissioning and Procurement Executive Committee Decision due: 12 Jan 2021 Lead officer: Steven Brookes Notice of proposed decision first published: 14/12/2020 Reason for urgency: The meeting is urgent and the business cannot be deferred to ensure that the Council can adequately continue to deliver its statutory functions in relation to Community Protection from September 2022 Anticipated restriction: Part exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: It is not in the public interest to disclose this information because the financial information is based on initial estimates, there is also full breakdown of financial elements of project included and sharing this information would not be recommended as it may prejudice the tender process.
3.	HR and Finance System Maintenance and Support - Key Decision New! Decision maker: Commissioning and Procurement Executive Committee Decision due: 9 Feb 2021 Lead officer: Colin Monckton, Lisa Wilkinson Notice of proposed decision first published: 14/12/2020 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: It is not in the public interest to disclose this information because it contains advice, which is subject to legal privilege. The public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the content of the report because it permits the decision maker to receive full and frank advice about legal issues without adversely prejudicing the City Council's ability to consider and manage those issues. Disclosure of contract details could prejudice ongoing and future contract negotiations.