28 Day Executive Notice

28-Day Notice for Executive Board - 22/03/2022 (21/02/2022 to 22/03/2022, Executive Board)

List items by:

Filter by ward:

Filter by department:

Show items:

Notice items
No.	Item
1.	Nottingham Business Improvement District Payment - Key Decision New! Decision maker: Executive Board Decision due: 22 Mar 2022 Lead officer: Robert Dixon Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/02/2022 Anticipated restriction: Open -
2.	Area Capital Fund Allocation for Highways and Transport - Key Decision New! Decision maker: Executive Board Decision due: 22 Mar 2022 Lead officer: Chris Keane Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/02/2022 Anticipated restriction: Open -
3.	Forest Recreation Ground Sports Zone - Phase Two - Key Decision New! Decision maker: Executive Board Decision due: 22 Mar 2022 Lead officer: Eddie Curry Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/02/2022 Anticipated restriction: Open -
4.	Sale of Premises at Stonebridge Court Industrial Estate, Alfred Street South, Nottingham - Key Decision New! Decision maker: Executive Board Decision due: 22 Mar 2022 Lead officer: Paul James Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/02/2022 Anticipated restriction: Part exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: It is not in the public interest to disclose this information because the report contains commercially sensitive details regarding the property valuation and expected capital receipt that, if published, would prejudice the Council’s ability to secure best value in future negotiations.
5.	Highways Delivery Options - Key Decision New! Decision maker: Executive Board Decision due: 22 Mar 2022 Lead officer: Ian Edward Notice of proposed decision first published: 21/02/2022 Anticipated restriction: Fully exempt - view reasons Explanation of anticipated restriction: It is not in the public interest to disclose this information because the report contains both sensitive business, commercial and financial details and privileged legal advice that, if published, would significantly prejudice the Council’s position in ongoing negotiations and its ability to secure best value.