Agenda and minutes

Schools Forum
Tuesday, 25th January, 2022 1.45 pm

Venue: Remote - To be held remotely via Zoom - View directions

Contact: Mark Leavesley  0115 876 4302

No. Item


Appointment of Chair


This item was deferred for nominations and, to allow for a Chair to be in place prior to the next meeting on 1 March 2022, it was agreed that elections for the position would be done via an email ballot administered by the Clerk to the Forum.


As such, Paul Burke, Vice-Chair, assumed the Chair for this meeting.


Apologies for Absence


Lisa Wilson (14-19 Education) – substituted by Caroline Sheard

Lee Morgan (Special Academies)

Rob Perkins (Primary Academies)


Declarations of Interests




Constitution / membership pdf icon PDF 368 KB

To review the School Forum’s Constitution and membership




Mark Leavesley (Clerk to the Forum) explained that the Constitution of the Schools Forum should be reviewed annually but due to the Covid pandemic this had not been done.


Resolved that the Schools Forum Constitution, as attached to the agenda, be approved.




Nick Lee, Director of Education Services reported that he had explored training sessions for forum members and wanted to consider the role of the forum within the City Council’s governance structure, working with finance colleagues who would offer support in establishing an overview of the budget and various strands of the forum.


Mark Leavesley updated the membership as follows, and the Forum


(1)  noted:


(a)  the replacement of Stephen McLaren by Laura Patel (The Nottingham Nursery School);


(b)  the resignation of James Strawbridge (Primary Academies);


(b)  that having reached the end of their 3-year term of office, the following 4 members had agreed to stand again:


i)  Bob White (Secondary Academies);

ii)  Terry Smith (Primary maintained);

iii)  Kerrie Henton (Stone Soup);

iv)  Judith Kemplay (Primary maintained)


(c)  that a Secondary Academy vacancy had arisen as Cath Rowell had not agreed to stand again at the end of her 3-year term of office;


(2)  Resolved that Alison Tones (Maintained Primary Head Teachers) and Rob Perkins (Academy Primary Head Teachers) be appointed to the forum for a 3-year term of office.


Early Years Special Educational Needs Inclusion Fund (SEN IF) pdf icon PDF 158 KB

Report of Director for Education Services

Additional documents:


Kathryn Stevenson, Senior Commercial Business Partner (School Funding) introduced the report on the Early Years Special Educational Needs Inclusion Fund. The following information was highlighted:


a)  The Special Educational Needs (SEN) Inclusion Fund budget has been underspent in previous years due to fewer children qualifying for lower level support than anticipated when the budget was first set. Underspends have been distributed in full to providers each year on a basis consulted on via Schools Forum, pending a full review of the SEN IF in conjunction with the review of high needs funding arrangements for the early year’s phase.


b)  A sector wide consultation had taken place and all schools and providers were invited to respond to a consultation questionnaire between 7th and 15th December 2021 which had received a good level of engagement.


c)  The proposal was that the budget remains the same for 3 and 4 year olds; the number of children qualifying for High Level Needs (HNL) block being much higher than in previous years. Whilst it was proposed for the budget to remain the same, a further proposal was the introduction of two new strands of support to:


·  Introduce a setting level for those with the greatest number of high needs children needing support;

·  Third universal level of strand support to help all settings.


d)  The underspend would be universally distributed to all settings due to the heightened Speech, Language and Communications needs as a result of the pandemic.


e)  It was proposed that the budget for 2 year olds be reduced; a budget had been set but very few 2 year olds were qualifying as it was very difficult to distinguish low level Special Educational Needs in that age bracket.


f)  The introduction of the two strands would mitigate future underspends although there remains some unpredictability as the number of high level needs pupils are not always known coupled with a high level of young contingents.


Resolved to note:


(1)  the results of the sector wide consultation on proposals to revise the SEN IF eligibility criteria from April 2022 and the use of SEN IF underspends, as detailed in appendix A of the report;


(2)  that the LA proposes to implement the revised SEN IF criteria, as outlined in paragraph 2.5 of the report, from April 2022;


(3)  that the LA proposes to reduce the SEN IF budget set aside from 2-year-old funding to £0.010m from April 2022, as outlined in paragraph 2.4 of the report;


(4)  the proposal to distribute the £0.148m SEN IF under-spend from 2020/21 to schools/settings on the basis outlined in paragraph 2.7 of the report, and to use a similar approach for the SEN IF underspend arising in 2021/22.


Schools Budget 2022-23 pdf icon PDF 577 KB

Report of Corporate Director for People


Paul Burke commented that there were over 80 local authorities whose Schools Budgets were in a deficit and credited officers for getting Nottingham City Council into a positive position.


Julia Holmes, Senior Commercial Business Partner, introduced a report that presented the proposed Schools Budget for the financial year (FY) 2022/23. The following information was highlighted:


a)  The overall indicative 2022/23 Schools Budget to be spent incorporating the Schools, Central Schools Services, EY’s and HN’s blocks is £324.535m.


b)  Following the Autumn 2021 spending review, local authorities have also been allocated supplementary funding for 2022 to 2023 worth £1.2 billion on top of the schools NFF. This equates to £7m for Nottingham City maintained schools and academies. For early years and post-16 provision in schools, the grant is being provided in respect of the Health and Social Care Levy. For primary and secondary provision, the grant is being provided in respect of both the Health and Social Care Levy and other cost pressures.


c)  After applying the +2% minimum funding guarantee (MFG) per pupil within the local funding formula (this is the maximum MFG that can be applied within the formula in 2022/23), this has created expenditure of £246.180m in the schools block. This left a surplus balance of £0.519m unallocated; this has since been allocated to the pupils growth contingency fund as the most equitable way of distributing the money.


d)  The early years national funding formula (EYNFF) dictates the hourly rate that each Local Authority receives for 3 & 4 year olds; the rate for 2022/23 has increased by £0.17 per hour compared to the rate for 2021/22 and an increase of £0.21 per hour for 2 year olds. This increase was significantly greater than previous years and the increase would be passed on to schools and providers.


e)  As one of the Local Authorities due to gain most significantly under the HN NFF, Nottingham City has received an 11% increase per head of 2-18 population which is the maximum allowable gain. The LA’s provisional EY block allocation, as published on 16 December 2021, is £21.181m. In 2022/23 LA’s can receive increases between 8% to 11% per head of population.


f)  The figures provided were provisional and would be amended as a result of the detailed calculation of indicative budgets for settings prior to the end of February and the finalisation of 2022/23 service budgets. The provisional budget figures are underpinned by the assumptions and principles which were unlikely to change.


In response to questions raised, the following information was noted:


g)  With regards the daily provision funding for AP schools it was noted that the AP was commissioned via the Pupil Referral Unit (PRU) and there was a proposed increase in the budget by the PRU to reflect potential increases in the sector who will be setting their prices accordingly to take into account the Health and Social Care Levy.

h)  The R21 rollout has previously been funded from reserves but there will be a need for managerial oversights  ...  view the full minutes text for item 23.


Dates of future meetings

To note that the Forum will meet at 1.45pm on the following dates during the remainder of the academic year 2021/22:



01 March

26 April

28 July


The Forum noted the following meeting dates and agreed that, for the foreseeable future, meetings would be held remotely via Zoom;



01 March

26 April


The meeting scheduled for 28 July was moved to 19 July.